A slightly modified version of this article appeared in German in Der Europäer, Perseus Verlag, Basel, June 2020, p. 16-22.
We have experienced a situation that is unique in history: a worldwide shut-down of people and economy. An illustration on the cover of The Economist said it well: planet earth was “closed” It is now hesitantly re-opening.
https://www.economist.com/weeklyedition/2020-03-21
This event has divided people into two groups. One group believes that the government has acted out of a responsible consideration of all the facts. Since these are not all known to the general public, they trust that the government made the right decision and follow its directives. The other group is reluctant to do as they are told—to stay at home during the periods of quarantine, to wear masks, etc. Threats and penalties have not been very effective. Do these people not realize they need to protect themselves? The problem is that they do not experience any real danger. Outside of the media reports, not many people are directly acquainted with someone who has had this particular corona disease. They are more likely to have heard indirectly through another person about someone else suffering from it,and the sick person reported somewhat more severe symptoms than an ordinary flu, perhaps additional respiratory complaints or temporary loss of smell and taste, but they usually recovered completely. People are rarely directly acquainted with someone who was put on a ventilator or died. People’s actual experience is that this disease is not very widespread and that the ill usually recover. An exception is the old people’s homes. These have clearly been affected by the corona disease, but not the general population. This is why it has been hard to get people to stay at home for quarantine or comply with the other regulations imposed today.
Even members of the German Parliament belong to this second group. The great majority do not wear masks or practice social distancing, as Martin Sichert, himself a member of Parliament, complains.(2) He reminds his colleagues of their responsibility to set an example for the people. However, he does not wonder about the reason for their behavior. The members of Parliament seem to have more confidence in their own experience than in the media or in the regulations made by themselves and their government.
When we look back at a serious epidemic such as the polio epidemic of the 1950s, the situation was completely different. Many people were affected, especially children. Many lay paralyzed for long periods of time and often had lasting damage. It was not necessary to convince people that this disease was dangerous.
* From an interview with Wolfgang Wodarg entitled: “War on the citizens: COVID-19 or giant hoax?”.(1)
The corona disease — similar to a normal flu?
From the start, a considerable number of physicians with years of experience reported that this coronavirus is not much more dangerous than the annual seasonal flu. In Germany, one of the first to speak out was Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg. He is an internist, pulmonologist and epidemiologist. For many years he was director of a municipal health department, also a representative to the German Parliament, chair of the Parliamentary Assembly Committee for Safety, Medicine and Health in the Council of Europe and board member of the anticorruption organization Transparency International. As he pointed out, a wave of flu like this arises every year and there are always people who die of it, usually older people with preexisting diseases, especially if they are bedridden. Taking the example of Germany (with a population of 80 million), at the peak of a flu outbreak as many as 600 people per day may die. This continues for a while and then recedes by itself—without a country-wide quarantine. At the end of the year statistics will show that anywhere from several hundred up to 20 thousand people have died of the flu in Germany that year. That is the normal outcome. He explained at the time (March 24) that when he compares the daily death rate of the corona disease with the seasonal flu of previous years, there are no more deaths than normal. In fact, in 2018 there were 25 thousand deaths from the flu—five thousand more than normal. That was still not a reason to sound the alarm: in some years the number of flu
deaths is slightly higher.(3)
Prof. Dr. Klaus Püschel also spoke out in the article 60 Expert Statements. As a physician and director of the Institute for Forensic Medicine at the Hamburg University Clinic, he conducts autopsies, including on corona victims. He said: “This virus is having an entirely excessive influence on our lives. It is out of all proportion to the danger posed by the virus itself. And the astronomical economic damage this is now causing is not in keeping with the danger which comes from it.”(4) Prof. Dr. Stefan Hockertz, immunologist and former director of the Institute for Experimental and Clinical Toxicology in Hamburg, put it clearly in an interview March 31, 2020: “Most countries are showing a lethality [death rate] that is comparable to that of influenza [flu]… One of the most respected medical journals, The New England Journal of Medicine, published significant figures on COVID-19 and came to the conclusion: ‘These suggest that in the end, the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 are more similar to those of a heavy seasonal influenza (with a death rate of about 0.1%)…’ It is worth noting,” he added, “that Great Britain has just downgraded the danger level of the COVID-19 virus from ‘highly infectious’ to ‘infectious.’ “(5) These are only some of the many physicians and specialists who have been speaking up in Germany.
If this is nothing more than a particularly bad flu, why the need for ventilator use?
In Germany the recommended therapy for emergency cases of hospitalized corona patients consists of an antipyretic for fever and two antiviral drugs.(6) The problem with this treatment is that it can make the disease worse instead of better. In the article Vaccination: From Childhood Diseases to the Flu?, the vital role of high fever (between 102.2° and 104° F/ 39° and 40 °C ) in overcoming infections is emphasized.(7) High temperature kills bacteria directly and prevents the multiplication of viruses. In addition, high fever sets off the alarm for the entire immune system, so that for instance white blood cells enter the blood and are activated. It was for these important findings that André Lwoff received the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1965. So according to these findings, to reduce fever (if the patient has a healthy heart) is an error. It enables bacteria and viruses to proliferate and hinders the immune system from unfolding. Moreover, the antiviral drugs given are toxic substances which, although they destroy many of the viruses, also deliver a powerful blow to the immune system, weakening patients’ ability to defend themselves against the viruses. This raises the question whether it is the treatment itself that results in a more problematic course of corona disease and makes it necessary to use ventilation. Furthermore, there was the worry that the staff around the patients would get infected if these had an oxygen mask, so that ventilation was preferred. But then ventilation itself significantly elevates mortality due to the serious complications that accompany it.
Hydroxychloroquine, a drug traditionally used to treat malaria, is also being used worldwide and was recommended by the WHO for use in clinical trials. It is just as toxic to the immune system as the antiviral medicines and additionally can cause heart arrhythmia. However, there is still a more serious and less well-known side-effect: in the high dosage given to corona patients, it can lead to death in people of certain racial groups, namely people of tropical and Mediterranean origin (these are Blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and Italians). Up to 30% of these people, usually men, may have favism, a hereditary disease that results from an enzyme deficiency. They react to hydroxychloroquine with destruction of the red blood cells, which then clot and close the small blood vessels (microthrombus), including in the lungs. This prevents the patients from getting enough air, so that they asphyxiate. It looks as if they have died of the corona disease, but it is actually the body’s reaction to the hydroxychloroquine which killed them. It is negligent on the part of the WHO that it does not expressly warn about this frequent side effect. Although it is taught in medical schools and listed among the possible side effects, it is easy to miss, especially for doctors who are unfamiliar with malaria therapy.(8) Small clots can also form and go into the blood vessels of the lungs when people do not move much—especially elderly people, not only when they are bedridden, but when they are confined to their homes during quarantine.
The significance of the death rate
To determine the danger level of a flu, it is not relevant how many people become ill, or only get infected without having any symptoms. In all yearly flus this number always reaches during the year into the millions (about 50% of the population), but the overwhelming majority of these millions recover without any lasting damage. This is why it is not important how many fall ill. What is important is the number of deaths. This is what indicates the danger level of a particular flu.
It is also important to note that the only test available today to diagnose the coronavirus infection, the PCR-test, is not specific. It reacts positive, for instance, to the common and more harmless coronaviruses—virus-strains of the same family as this year’s corona disease—which are present every year in 5 to 15 % of all flus, or also when a person has received the flu vaccination within the last few years. So this test produces many false positives: it responds positive to people who are not infected at all. It is therefore misleading, giving the impression there are many more people infected than there really are. A reliable diagnosis is provided not by the test but by the disease symptoms mentioned above: a flu with somewhat stronger symptoms than usual, perhaps along with respiratory complaints or temporary loss of taste and smell.
Was there a high death rate of corona disease in Italy?
As of March 25 of this year, 2,500 people had died in Italy from this disease. In view of such an apparently large number, a statistical analysis was undertaken.(9) Of the 2,500 people who died, 99.2 % had between one and three additional diseases besides the corona disease. In his Open Letter to the German Chancellor, Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi objected to what he called the inadmissible use of this statistic to determine the danger of the corona disease. A physician and specialist in infectious disease and microbiology, he was director of the Institute for Microbiology and Hygiene and a teaching member at the Medical University in Mainz for over 20 years. He is one of the most quoted medical researchers in Germany. As he says in his speech, this way of using a statistic breaks with a fundamental law of infectology: the ill population under study must be affected with this disease alone.(10) How else can the degree of danger posed by this one disease be determined?
This statistical study done in Italy also indicated that the average age of the deceased was 79.5 years. Of the 2,500 who had died, only seventeen were under 50 years old. And all of those under 40 who succumbed were already in serious medical condition before contracting the corona disease. This indicates that younger people die of this disease mostly when they are already quite ill, and that this corona disease is dangerous to older people who have preexisting diseases. But the same applies to all flus. The question is whether this corona disease is more dangerous for this group than the ordinary flu.
The world death rate in the first three months of this year
Worldometer is a website that gathers world statistical data. (Fig. 2) One of its tables, for example, lists the total number of people in the world who died between January 1 and March 25 of the present year, classified by cause of death.
Fig. 2. https://www.worldometers.info/.
During this period of time, approximately 20 thousand people died of the coronavirus in the whole world—including older people with preexisting disease. However there were 110 thousand people who died in this same period of the seasonal flu. This is five times more than from the coronavirus. In other words, if the cause of death was correctly diagnosed, the seasonal flu is five times more dangerous than the coronavirus—including for older people with preexisting diseases.
It is also interesting to compare the death toll from the coronavirus with that from traffic accidents. 300 thousand people died in traffic accidents in this period. In other words, traffic accidents killed fifteen times more people than the coronavirus. Nevertheless, nobody has suggested prohibiting the use of cars. The risk of death from driving is considered an acceptable trade-off for our mobility. But only 20 thousand corona deaths was considered serious enough to bring the entire economy to a standstill.
This is why Wodarg speaks of the “emperor’s new clothes.”(11) There have not been more deaths from this disease than from a usual flu. What happened, he says, is that China made a “big deal” out of it. It even built a hospital overnight specially for it. In Japan things went similarly as in China, but not as much was made of it. Europe was frightened, and when the disease arrived the politicians reacted so strongly that the Parliaments went so far as restricting basic constitutional rights. The politicians followed their advisors without seeking another point of view. Along with the media, Wodarg says, they had leaned so far out the window that their credibility would be questioned if they now reversed course.(3) But as Bhakdi reminds us, it is their duty to listen to scientists who advocate a different view. Restricting basic rights is permissible only when there is a real state of emergency. The measures which have been taken are in no way proportional to the danger posed by the virus and are therefore unconstitutional.(12)
Sweden goes its own way
Sweden also introduced certain health safety measures such as social distancing, but it did not make economic restrictions or shut down the schools. Only assemblies of more than 50 people were prohibited. That is the Asian model. In Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Hongkong and Taiwan there have been no economic restrictions or closings of schools to date. Nevertheless the death rate from the corona disease is leveling off in all these countries, as it is in Sweden. Sweden’s decision to go its own way was taken by chief state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell and Prime Minister Stefan Löfven. Their approach is, as little protection as necessary and as much infection as possible—while protecting the vulnerable—in order to achieve widespread immunity. In this way the coronavirus can be overcome by most members of the population in the long term. It can no longer affect them as a whole. That is the best “vaccine.” Löfven’s goal has been to do as little damage to the economy as possible by keeping the work process going as long as possible and interfering only where needed. He is criticized for taking the risk that there might be more deaths than absolutely necessary, in which case his action would have been legally negligent. However, inasmuch as science is divided as to whether protection or extensive immunity is the best strategy, Löfven answers: “Right now it is a matter of using common sense.”(13) And it is working: the results in Sweden have not been very different than in the countries that closed down their economies. Thus, the risk of death from the corona disease in Sweden (status of June 14, 2020) is similar, for instance, to that in France: 1 out of 2,000 is at risk of dying of the coronavirus in Sweden, 1 out of 2,300 in France. (14)
A natural treatment for the corona disease
A natural treatment for the corona disease is the same as for any flu. Older people with preexisting diseases can take prophylactic measures against the flu to protect themselves. One measure offering very good protection is consistent avoidance of all sugar for four weeks starting when the flu season begins in the population. This means that sugar itself as well as anything containing sugar should not be eaten. This also applies to honey, maple syrup, etc. Fruit on the other hand is fine, since the sugar is bound to the flesh of the fruit and is therefore absorbed slowly. Pure sugar itself, however, is highly soluble and is absorbed immediately. This initially causes a rapid rise in the blood sugar level, to which the body reacts around an hour later with compensatory low blood sugar. This is the moment when a person becomes susceptible to infection.
If one does get the flu, strict bed rest with mainly sleeping or dozing is obligatory. Our forces should then not be spent on outward activity, but be focused within to overcome the illness. Most complications are caused by non-compliance with this measure. Instead of treating the headache and reducing temperature with analgesics and antipyretics (Ibuprofen, Metamizole, Paracetamol, aspirin, etc.), which both lower the temperature, one or two overwarming baths during the illness to raise the body temperature, ideally up to 102.2°F (39° C), have an antibacterial and antiviral effect and stimulate the immune system. A diet without sugar, mustard compresses on the chest and if possible a concentrated mixture of peppermint oil, levomenthol, etc., (for instance in Salviathymol®, made by the German company Madaus, which can be bought at http://westparkapotheke.com from the international Westpark Pharmacy), 5 drops every hour in a little water, will complete the treatment (for exact instructions, see link in note 7). This treatment will avoid most complications.
In addition vitamin C, if possible in natural form (such as acerola tablets from the acerola cherry), has a stimulating effect on the immune system. For prophylaxis, the equivalent of 1 gram of vitamin C (usually 2 acerola tablets) can be taken in the morning for four weeks, as of the beginning of the seasonal flu in the population. In case of a flu disease, the equivalent of 1 g of vitamin C can be taken five times a day as long as symptoms persist. Experience with the use of vitamin C in China and the United States shows significantly better results than with allopathic medicines. Furthermore vitamin C is harmless, even at the highest doses.(15)
Why the global overreaction?
Economists have been grappling with this question. Andreas Popp asks: if this illness is dangerous to older people with preexisting diseases, why were not only these people quarantined and taken care of, and all the others allowed to keep the work process going as usual? Why this crash?(16) Ernst Wolff goes so far as to refer to the restrictive economic meassures as a financial “putsch”—an intentionally caused economic collapse.(17) Through closure of the economy a great part of humanity has been put on the road to impoverishment without good reason.
The documentary film The WHO – in the Grip of the Lobbyists? reports that the WHO is not financially independent. Only 20% of its budget is covered by the member state contributions. 80% is financed by private contributions, mostly from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The second largest donor is GAVI, likewise founded by the Gates Foundation as a public-private partnership of the Gates Foundation with the WHO, UNICEF, The World Bank and the pharmaceutical industry.(18) The problem is that these private contributions to the WHO are given only for specific purposes. This means that the WHO is then bound to the private interests of its donors. The result is that the WHO is not independent, but heavily influenced by the private interests of the Gates Foundation, and yet at the same time it has the power to declare a pandemic without supervisory control, as occurred on March 11 of this year. In response, most countries shut down a large part of their economies within a few days by imposing a quarantine on their population. In other words the WHO, directed by private interests, has the power to shut down the world economy.
Wodarg draws attention to a change made by the WHO in the definition of the word “pandemic”—a change that has significantly strengthened the WHO’s own power. A pandemic is by definition a marked increase of a disease. However, this disease has to be dangerous enough to justify closing down the economy. This means, it must:
1) be a serious disease (leaving permanent damage) and/or
2) have a high mortality.
This was the case for instance with the earlier polio epidemic. It was also the case in theplague, the cholera and other epidemics, but it is not the case with the normal yearly flu, which is relatively harmless.
Shortly before the swine flu of 2009, the WHO changed this definition. The word serious was changed to new while the second condition, high mortality, was dropped entirely. In other words since 2009, all that is needed for the WHO to declare a pandemic and shut down the world economy is that a disease be new. This gives the WHO the power to declare a pandemic every year, Wodarg objects. With each seasonal flu there is a strong increase of a “new” disease. Flu viruses change slightly every year, so they are always “new.”(3) However, the flu is neither a serious illness, nor does it usually lead to death. These two conditions cannot be dropped.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. confronts Bill Gates head on
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., nephew of the assassinated US president, is an attorney, founder and chairman of Children’s Health Defense, environmental activist and author. In an Instagram article he made serious charges against Bill Gates. If any of the charges in his article were false, then Gates would sue him immediately for libel. But the charges are justified, so Gates is unable to sue him.
Kennedy accuses Gates (among others) of the following:
— The 2000-2017 campaign against polio financed by Bill Gates, instead of preventing polio, resulted in an epidemic that left more than 450,000 children paralyzed. When the Indian state responded to Indian doctors’ protests and put an end to the vaccination campaign, the polio wave correspondingly rapidly subsided. In 2017 the WHO reluctantly admitted that the global explosion of polio, not only in India but also in the Congo, the Philippines and Afghanistan, could be traced back to polio vaccine strains from Gates’ vaccination program.
— In 2014 the Gates Foundation financed tests of experimental vaccines against cervical cancer (using Gardasil® from GSK), which were conducted on 23,000 young girls in remote regions of India. 1,200 of these girls suffered serious side effects including autoimmune diseases and fertility disorders; seven died. Since February this year the case has been under review by the Supreme Court of India.
— In 2010 Gates donated 10 billion dollars to the WHO. One month later he said in a public online conference that population could be reduced in part through the use of new vaccines. In 2014 doctors in Kenya accused the WHO of having sterilized millions of women against their will by using a fake “tetanus vaccine.” Independent laboratories found the samesterility formula in all of the vaccines tested. Similar accusations were heard from Tanzania, Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. After first denying the charges, the WHO finally admitted it had been developing the sterility vaccines for over a decade.
— In 2017 a study (Morgensen et al.) revealed that the DPT-vaccine of the WHO was killing more Africans than the diseases it claimed to prevent. The death rate among vaccinated children was ten times higher than among unvaccinated children.
These are only a few of the crimes against humanity of which Kennedy accuses Gates in his article.(19) As mentioned above, the Gates Foundation, along with the GAVI founded by it, is the largest of the donors to the 80% privately-funded WHO.
Surprisingly enough, the Gates Foundation also makes contributions in Germany. In 2019 the Robert Koch Institute, responsible for monitoring the progress of the corona disease in the population and therefore indirectly for regulating economic restrictions in the country, received 250,000 dollars from the Gates Foundation. The Charité University Hospital of Berlin, where Prof. Christian Drosten works as a virologist and is the principal advisor to German Chancellor Angela Merkel, received 330,000 dollars. Even the German media received a generous share of the contributions. Die Zeit, a highly respected newspaper, received 290,000 dollars. Spiegel Online even received 2.5 million dollars. Both Gates and Merkel, as well as the Robert Koch Institute (not to speak of the media) have unanimously been broadcasting the message that a second corona wave will come—and moreover that without vaccination the coronavirus will not be overcome quickly enough to avoid an excessively high number of deaths. Could these messages be connected with the contributions? The Gates Foundation also donates to the ID2020 project, which is working towards mass vaccination with a digital chip as small as a grain of sand that identifies each human being. This is also an endeavor of Gates’ company, Microsoft.(20) It is already in use for tracking members of the military.
Journalist Ken Jebsen poses the question why Bill Gates is able to carry out criminal activities in the Third World with impunity. [This question concerns also the WHO (D.B.)] Furthermore, it is a criminal offense, Jebsen says, to use financial contributions to influence government policy and the media. He invokes article 20 of the German constitution: the right to resistance. If legislators whose responsibility it is to protect citizens by enforcing the law, themselves break the law and issue orders such as compulsory vaccination citizens have a right, indeed a duty, to resist. Such compulsion can also be made indirectly by denying basic rights to those who refuse to be vaccinated, such as the right to study and practice occupations that require contact with many people, or the right to enter certain countries.(21)
What about the United States?
In a YouTube interview, Scott Jensen, a medical doctor and Minnesota state senator, draws attention to a document sent to doctors on March 4, 2020 by the NVSS (National Vital Statistics System of the U.S.) with instructions about when to enter the diagnosis “COVID-19” on death certificates. (Figs. 6 and 7)
Fig. 6. Photo from: Doctors & Politicians: America, Wake up!
Fig.7. From: Doctors & Politicians: America, Wake up! https://youtu.be/D5gBzmoUWEQ
This document stipulates that COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificates not only for all decedents where the disease caused death, but also when it was assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Later on, this directive advises avoiding any terms indicating uncertainty such as “probable COVID-19” or “likely COVID-19”. (Fig. 8)
Fig. 8. From: Doctors & Politicians: America, Wake up! https://youtu.be/D5gBzmoUWEQ
Jensen speaks vehemently against these official directives. If physicians can only assume that the coronavirus caused death or if the coronavirus only contributed to death, they should definitely not enter this diagnosis on the death certificates.
Later on, the interview turns to the topic of reimbursement to hospitals from insurance companies after the death of a patient. Hospitals are normally reimbursed according to the financial expense incurred for different diseases. Pneumonia, for example, is compensated at $3,000, Jensen explains. COVID-19 brings in $13,000, and this increases to $40,000 if ventilation was necessary. (Fig. 9) (22)
Fig. 9. Photo from: Doctors & Politicians: America, Wake up! https://youtu.be/D5gBzmoUWEQ
It is clear that the inexact definition of the cause of death from COVID-19, together with such high reimbursement, encourages entering this diagnosis on the death certificates, especially at a time when hospitals are suffering financially from low patient numbers. And this artificially inflates the statistics.
What is happening?
When one surveys all of these facts, one becomes aware of a much more troubling aspect of the present corona phenomenon: the widespread endeavor to make it look like a pandemic, and not what the New England Journal of Medicine described already at the end of March as “…a heavy seasonal influenza.”(5) Why?
The spiritual dimension
As early as 1919, Rudolf Steiner spoke of the coming incarnation of Ahriman on earth in the West “before even a part of the third millennium (…) will have passed.”(23) Steiner is speaking here of our present times. Ahriman is either already incarnated or preparing his incarnation so that it can be successful. Success for him would be to encounter an unprepared, sleeping humanity that can be easily manipulated. He could then put a stop for a long time to the development of people towards freedom of thought, which leads to independence of judgment. Then people could be manipulated to do what is wrong. The corona crisis cannot be understood without this knowledge.
Our task is to recognize this. That alone has a disruptive effect on his plans, as can be seen from the widespread negative treatment of professionals who express different views of the corona crisis. Wodarg, Kennedy, and many others are brand marked as conspiracy theorists. It is interesting that these people are not laymen but highly experienced medical doctors and other professionals. They feel it is their duty to point out to the discrepancies between the official information and reality. Swiss cardiologist Thomas Binder, who spoke out in this direction, and lawyer Beate Bahner who attempted to take legal action against the German state for restricting basic constitutional rights without sufficient reason: both were taken by the police to psychiatric hospitals (the former in Switzerland, the latter in Germany) for several days. Jebsen (cited in this article) escaped an assassination attempt in June. Simply recognizing and pointing out the discrepancy between these official views and reality has a powerful disruptive effect on Ahriman’s plan. At the same time, to recognize this discrepancy also wakes us up and develops our freedom of thought. This is the true, higher mission of Ahriman for humanity.
Steiner points to many signs by which Ahriman can be recognized. His goal is to manipulate, and one way to do this is to create “facts on the ground” rapidly, practically overnight: we are ambushed, with no time to think before we act. Only a few days passed between the WHO’s declaration of a pandemic and the shutting down of the world economy. Our task is to become alert.
Another sign is the stirring up of fear to make humanity compliant, for example by using a primal human fear, the fear of asphyxiation—in this case through a lung disease. This has been exploited by the media, flooding us with frightening images of this and other kinds. Also the fear of being intimidated for not wearing a mask or ostracized by our friends and family if we are sceptical of the official version of the corona disease is very powerful. A further sign is the creation of confusion. The official information on the corona disease contradicts what we ourselves experience, namely that it is not so widespread and that the ill usually recover. The numerous objections made by experienced outsider physicians and professionals explain and strengthen our impression. The discrepancy between this and the official version produces confusion. The statistics as well are confusing and must be first analyzed—when they are not downright falsified. We need to use our common sense to recognize truth, and from the perspective of Ahriman’s incarnation what we see begins to become more understandable.
One further sign of Ahriman’s activity is the true “pandemic”: the spread of materialism, thebelief that everything can be explained in terms of matter, of physics and chemistry. All therest—biology, psychology, religion—is considered merely an effect of matter. There is nospirit and there are no spiritual beings. Nothing serves Ahriman as effectively as the beliefthat he does not exist. It is just then that he can work directly in human hearts and manipulate them. To cement this materialism, according to Steiner, “a vaccine will be foundby which the organism is so conditioned (…) that this human body will not come to thethought: there is a soul and a spirit.”(24) We must be aware of the risks posed by any vaccination (see note 7). However, based on the numerous appeals of outsider physicians and on our own experience, we can recognize that there is no real reason to vaccinate against this disease, because it is not dangerous. On the other hand, the pressure put by Bill Gates on the government to assume all financial risks for any damage caused by an insufficiently tested vaccine is not very reassuring. Finally, an impoverished humanity is clearly a humanity that is desperate and manipulable. It is ready to be destructive or submissive. We are seeing both of these now.
Coronavirus: a war
The Coronavirus is not a disease, but a war. It is a spiritual war in which we are all participating. We are all called upon to wake up and resist. We must see the events clearly in order to counter them. In this task the ever-present help of the “good spirits” will not fail us.
Daphnévon Boch, MD.
About the author
Daphné von Boch was born in Canada and lives in Basel, Switzerland. Following many years of activity in two anthroposophic rehabilitation clinics, she now maintains her own private practice as an anthroposophic physician and psychologist. She trains physicians in anthroposophic medicine, chiefly in Slavic and Asian countries, and republishes the books of Otto Wolff.
Notes
(1) Wodarg, Wolfgang. “Krieg gegen die Bürger: Covid-19 oder Riesenfake?” [War against the
citizens: Covid-19 or giant hoax?]. YouTube, March 17, 2020,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dk8wqJbNhq0.
(2) Sichert, Martin. “Martin Sichert in Bundestag – Endlich sagt es einer – Steuer, Mundschutz,
Abstandregeln” [Martin Sichert in Parliament – Finally someone is saying it – Taxes, Masks,
Distancing Rules]. YouTube, May 27, 2020, https://youtu.be/Jww-x9TM2J0.
(3) Wodarg, Wolfgang. “Der Corona-Rebell” [The Corona Rebell]. YouTube interview, March 24, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmk2KpUhUWQ.
(4) Püschel, Klaus. “60-Experten-Statements” [60 Expert Statements]. Article in blauerbote.com, April 9, 2020, http://blauerbote.com/2020/04/09/corona-krise-60-experten-statements.
(5) Hockertz, Stefan. “Full Stop der Volkswirtschaften: Endlich wieder wissensbasiert und
vernünftig handeln” [Economic Shutdown: Let’s finally act rationally again based on science].
YouTube article in wallstreet-online, March 31, 2020, https://www.wallstreet-online.
de/nachricht/12348072-immunologe-hockertz-interview-full-stop-volkswirtschaftenendlich-
wissensbasiert-vernuenftig-handeln.
(6) Kluge, Stefan et al. “Empfehlung zur intensivmedizinischen Therapie von Patienten mit
COVID-19” [Recommendation for intensive medical treatment of patients with COVID-19].
Springer Verlag, March 12, 2020, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00063-020-00674-3.
(7) von Boch, Daphné. “Vaccination: From Childhood Diseases to the Flu?”,
https://home.solari.com/vaccinations-from-childhood-diseases-to-the-flu/
(8) Wodarg, Wolfgang. “Ein Menschheitsverbrechen” [A Crime against Humanity]. YouTube
interview, May 31, 2020, https://youtu.be/JNZuBvDPT_A
(9) Bloomberg. “Studie der Italienischen Nationalen Gesundheits Institution” [Study of the Italian National Health Institute[. bloomberg news, March 17, 2020,
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-03-18/99-of-those-who-died-from-virus-had-other-illness-italy-says.
(10) Bhakdi, Sucharit. “Offener Brief an die Bundeskanzlerin” [Open Letter to the German
Chancellor]. YouTube, March 29, 2020,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsExPrHCHbw
(11) Wodarg, Wolfgang. “Steile Thesen zur Corona-Panik. YouTube. Because of Censure, to be
found now under: https://youtu.be/XnlT3rPNUp0
(12) Bhakdi, Sucharit. “Corona: Wahn ohne Ende” [Corona: Madness without End]. Talk Spezial,
Servus TV, March 29, 2020, https://www.servustv.com/videos/aa-23ud73pbh1w12/.
(13) Löfven, Stefan. “Macht Schweden es klüger?” [Is Sweden being smarter?]. Article on https://ntv.de,
March 31, 2020, https://www.n-tv.de/politik/politik_person_der_woche/Macht-Schweden-esklueger-
article21681620.html.
(14) Country’s population divided by total death of coronavirus in this country (in:
https://www.worldometers.info, see: Total Deaths).
(15) Cheng, Richard. “NCP (Nouvel Coronavirus Pneumonia) and Vitamin C” [New Coronavirus
Pneumonia and Vitamin C]. YouTube, February 17, 2020,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvUejiNAm-w. And: Brownstein, David and Ng, Richard (Doctors at The Center for Holistic Medicine, West Bloomfield, Michigan). “Doctors treating COVID-19.” The Highwire with Del Bigtree, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zgz5hRV2V-E.
“This link has been removed from YouTube due to censorship”
(16) Popp, Andreas. “Corona-Psychose als Waffe gegen die Wirtschaft” [Corona Psychosis as a
Weapon against the Economy]. YouTube, March 4, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3f7L6adp3U.
(17) Wolff, Ernst. “Corona und der herbeigeführte Crash” [Corona and the Intentional Crash]. YouTube, March 23, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_JCBai7I9I.
(18) “Die WHO – Im Griff der Lobbyisten?” [The WHO – in the Grip of the Lobbyists?]. Film from Doku ArteHD, March 14, 2018, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYlia_fQOLk.
(19) Kennedy, Robert F., Jr. “Robert F. Kennedy Jr. confronting Bill Gates head.” Fort Russ
News, March 9, 2020, “This link has been removed due to censorship”
(20) Seliger, Stefan. “Die unfassbaren Verstrickungen aufgedeckt” [The incredible entanglements
exposed]. YouTube, May 2, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPdl9xXLqm8
(21) Jebsen, Ken. “Gates kapert Deutschland!” [Gates takes Germany]. YouTube, kenFM, May 3, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DxzMpNoZOL0
“This link has been removed from YouTube due to censorship”
(22) Jensen, Scott. “Doctors and Politicians: America: Wake up!”, April 24, 2020, The Highwire
with Del Bigtree, https://youtu.be/D5gBzmoUWEQ.
(23) Steiner, Rudolf. The Incarnation of Ahriman. Rudolf Steiner Press, Forest Row, UK.
(24) Steiner, Rudolf, Steiner, Rudolf. Fall of the Spirits of Darkness. GA 177, Dornach, 7 October,
1917.